Dr. Anna Doebler


Raum:L 13, 15, Zimmer 521
name@adresse:adoebler ... mail.uni-mannheim.de


    • Item-Response-Theorie
    • Adaptives Testen
    • Implikationen von Fehlspezifikationen psychometrischer Modelle
    • Differential Susceptibility


  • Doebler, A. & Holling, H. (2016). A processing speed test based on rule-based item generation: An analysis with the Rasch poisson counts model. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 121-128. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.013.
  • Doebler, A., Doebler, P. & Holling, H. (2014). A latent ability model for count data and an application to processing speed. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 587–598. doi:10.1177/0146621614543513.
  • Doebler, A., Doebler, P. & Holling, H. (2013). Optimal and most exact confidence intervals for person parameters in item response theory models. Psychometrika, 78(1), 98–115. doi:10.1007/s11336-012-9290-4.
  • Doebler, A. (2012). The problem of bias in person parameter estimation in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255–270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304.
  • Grasshoff, U., Doebler, A., Holling, H. & Schwabe, R. (2012). Optimal design for linear regression models in the presence of heteroscedasticity caused by random coefficients. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 142, 1108–1113. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2011.11.025.
  • Doebler, A. (2011). Punktschätzung. In H. Holling & B. Schmitz (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologischen Methoden und Evaluation. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Curriculum Vitae